logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.30 2015가합522366
소유권이전등기말소 청구의 소
Text

1. On October 2014, the Defendant: (a) on each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, a vice registry office of the Seoul Central District Court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff completed each registration of the transfer of ownership on October 1, 2014 by the Seoul Central District Court Branch No. 43772, which was received on October 1, 2014, as to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and on October 1, 2014.

(hereinafter “Gift 1, 2014” (hereinafter “instant gift contract”). B.

On June 17, 2014, D, the Plaintiff, as the principal of the case, is the Seoul Family Court Decision 2014Ra5534 decided June 17, 2014, "A trial on the commencement of adult guardianship" of which the Plaintiff is the principal of the case, "a trial on the commencement of

On March 27, 2015, the above court filed a claim for the commencement of adult guardianship against the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff has continuously lacking the ability to handle affairs due to mental constraints due to disease, old age, etc., and rendered a judgment to appoint B as an attorney-at-law and an adult guardian exercising the Plaintiff’s right to make decisions on the management of the Plaintiff’s property. The instant judgment to commence adult guardianship became final and conclusive on April 14, 2015. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 8, and 13, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

(a) Capacity means the mental ability or intelligence that can be reasonably determined on the basis of the ordinary perception and history of one’s act, and the existence or absence of a capacity to act must be individually determined in relation to a specific juristic act. Therefore, in particular, in cases where a certain juristic act is given with a special legal meaning or effect that makes it difficult to understand only the ordinary meaning, it is required to understand not only the ordinary meaning of the act, but also the legal meaning or effect in order to recognize the capacity to act;

(See Supreme Court Decision 2008Da58367 Decided January 15, 2009, etc.). B.

I ambl, as seen earlier, the basic facts and evidence Nos. 3, 4, 7, 13, and B.

arrow