logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.09.23 2014고단1038
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six years;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:50 on April 19, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective injury, etc.) : (i) three parallel activities, such as E, at the “D” restaurant located in the first floor of the Seongbuk-gu, Pungwon-si, Changwon-si; (ii) three parallel activities, such as E, and (iii) three parallel activities, of the victim f (ma:27 years old); (iv) the victim f (ma: 27 years old); (v) the victim’s head was one time, and the victim’s head was a dangerous object in the table of the victim’s boom, which might have occurred after the victim was written on the floor, and (v) the victim’s head was at one time, and (v) the victim’s head was at one time, and the victim was at the victim’s head was at an empty disease, which is a dangerous object that could have been taken on the floor, and caused injury, such as double brak, requiring medical treatment for 14 days.

2. On the same day, at around 02:10 on the same day, the Defendant was forced to voluntarily commit the crime as referred to in paragraph (1) in front of the H task branch located in G as referred to in paragraph (1) and to voluntarily commit the said crime by the police officer of the Changwon Police Station of the Changwon Police Station, who driven away while walking, and by the J (the age of 48) of the victim J (the age of 28).

The defendant denies that there was no assault by another person, and he called "Choe gue mari" as "the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation," and boomed the victim.

Since then, the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender after being notified of the above I and the victim's suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, the reason for arrest, and the right to appoint a defense counsel.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer on the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the victim failed to receive approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of F, J, K, and L;

1. A report on emergency medical records and a written report on appraisal and commission;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the parts of the victim J;

1. Article 3(1) and Article 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow