logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.11.08 2018가단116340
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 31,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from April 28, 2015 to November 8, 2019.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts 1) The Plaintiff was a person working as a person in charge of inspection, installation, and repair of transformers in C, a corporation, and was working in a D corporation located at the time of leisure on April 28, 2015, and Nonparty E entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant, and Nonparty E entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) The employees of Co., Ltd. entered the construction site by carrying smoke gas and plastic water tanks for ruptures. During the work by using the said ruptures, C’s employees did not facilitate the operation of the valves of the ruptures of the ruptures, and C’s G department’s signal below C’s G department, operated the rupture installed on the Defendant vehicle, carried the ruptures of the ruptures of the ruptures of the ruptures of the ruptures of the ruptures of the ruptures of the Plaintiff, followed the ruptures of the ruptures of the Plaintiff’s ruptures of the ruptures of the Plaintiff’s ruptures of the ruptures of the Plaintiff’s ruptures of the ruptures of the ruptures of the ruptures of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

2) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the blood transfusion and the upper malone to the right side of the instant accident, the blood transfusion, the blood transfusion from the two sides to the right side of the instant accident, the blood transfusion from the two sides to the end, the pelle of the two sides to the right side, the pelle, the pelle of the pelle, the pelle of the left inside and the side walls, the pelle of the pelle, the pelle of the pelle, the pelle of the pelle, the e

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the instant accident occurred during the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, and thus, the Defendant, who is the mutual aid business entity, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident.

However, the defendant's responsibility is limited to 80% in consideration of the fact that the plaintiff is also obligated to promote the safety of himself/herself.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

arrow