logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.30 2016가단5266005
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff:

A. 73,407,599 Won and its therefrom from September 1, 2009 to November 30, 2018.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant Treatment Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Treatment Construction”).

(B) The construction of soundproof walls (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) from among the construction of the C Apartment, which is undertaken in Pakistan-si.

2) Defendant SP Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant SP”)

(2) On September 1, 2009, D, the on-site director, as an employee of the Defendant Treatment Construction, connected four parts of the employees belonging to the Defendant Treatment E to the corners of each of the instant work sites, and directed workers to walk up at the renals set up in the beams set up in the beam of the F mobile strawers driven by E, and to remove soundproof walls at a height of 3 meters.

The Plaintiff, a worker belonging to the Defendant Daewoo Esti, was on board a private structure in accordance with these instructions and was raised to the public, and the Plaintiff, a worker of the Defendant Esti, fell into the floor of the Plaintiff, which was on board a private structure, with two parts of the four parts connected with soundproof walls by contact with soundproof walls, which were connected with each other.

(3) Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of flags due to the flaging of dubs, flaging of dubs, flaging of dubs, flaging of the right side, flaging of dubs, and brain damage. 【Ground for Recognition.’ The Plaintiff did not have any dispute, 1, 4, 5, 8, 2, 3 evidence A, 6, 6, 7, 8 evidence A (including all evidence attached with a dubs, images, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. Article 86 of the Rules on the Standards for the Recognition of Liability for Industrial Safety and Health does not enable the business owner to transport a worker by using a mobile stick, or have a worker engage in work in a state where he employs a worker by carrying it (Paragraph 2). However, in light of the purport of Article 86(2) of the Rules on the Standards for Occupational Safety and Health, mobile sticks are included.

arrow