beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 102,680,208 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 25, 2012 to September 5, 2019.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. At around 2012, the Plaintiff worked in the cleaning administration division as an employee of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office. 2) On May 25, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) around 13:40, the Plaintiff worked in the said Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office; (b) around May 25, 2012, the Plaintiff used a train for having the air conditioners (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”); (c) performed the work of placing the air conditioners in the air conditioners, which are wastes; and (d) during the said work, the Plaintiff covered the Plaintiff.
(3) Due to the instant accident, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s credit thromatic typosis, the right balivosis and the light balposis, the frame and closure of the two thalposis, the thalpology of both sides, and the balpine balpine and the balpine balp of both sides, and the balp of the inner and inner walls, and the balp of the balp of the stalp of the stalpus, the thalp of the thalp of the stalp, the thalp of the stalp, the thalp of the stalp, the thalp of the stalpical balp, the thalp of the right balp of the balp, the eth of the f
5) In relation to the instant accident, Korea Workers’ Compensation & Welfare Service paid KRW 92,602,510 as temporary layoff benefits for the Plaintiff, and the amount equivalent to lump-sum disability compensation benefits related to the Plaintiff’s disability benefits is KRW 99,402,072. 【Ground for Recognition” did not have any dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and Eul’s evidence No. 3 (including paper numbers, and the purport of the whole
B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Plaintiff sustained injury due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as an insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle.
C. The limitation of liability, however, is not limited to the plaintiff's work and the work contents of the plaintiff's work are always visible, because the plaintiff's work within the work radius of the plaintiff's vehicle is likely to conflict with or fall up with the plaintiff's work in operation.