logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.17 2015나2046438
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendant C and the defendant B's appeal are dismissed, respectively.

2. The plaintiff's appeal is made.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases:

The 5th 15th 15th eth 15th eth eth eth 15th eth eth eth “A” means “A 3,9,12th eth eth e.g.

B. From 18th to 21th day of the first instance judgment is as follows.

“Therefore, Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 350,000,000,000, excluding the remainder of KRW 350,000,000,000, which is self-Recognizing that the Plaintiff was paid among the agreed amount of KRW 700,000,000, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from December 30, 2013 to the date of full payment.”

C. The first instance court’s 8th 8 and 9 first instance court’s “The entries of No. 9 and the fact-finding inquiry results with respect to the Court Administration Office of this Court” are as follows: “The entries of No. 9 and 11, the fact-finding results with respect to the Court Administration Office of First instance, and the fact-finding results with respect to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the court of first instance.”

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendant C and the appeal against the defendant B are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow