1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The reason why this Court, which has cited the judgment of the court of first instance, has been used in relation to this case, is to delete the part of the joint plaintiff A of the court of first instance, and to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the dismissal or addition of the corresponding part as follows.

After the 6th sentence of the first instance court's decision, "Seocheon City announced the cancellation decision of the designation of the urban renewal acceleration district as of July 7, 2014 by the Ministry of Environment No. 2014-143, July 7, 2014."

Part 4 and 5 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court states "A Nos. 3, 7, 8, and Eul Nos. 9 and 10 (including paper numbers)" as "A Nos. 3, 7, 8, 68, and Eul Nos. 9 and 10 (including paper numbers), the results of the inquiry of the additional court of the first instance into the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the first instance court."

The following "property damage" in Part 14 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court shall be added "(in the case of the plaintiff D, including the late payment charge of KRW 5,310,470)."

From October 31, 2009, the association of the AM district urban environment rearrangement project established for the urban environment rearrangement project in the AM district at the AL Group of the 9th trial decision of the first instance court, "(4)" was selected as the contractor by the defendant Treatment Construction, the Hanhwa Construction and the Dongbu Construction Co., Ltd.

In addition, the facts that there is no dispute between the second and third acts of the first instance court's decision, "(based on recognition), Eul evidence 1 through 7, 12, 15, 25 through 27, and the fact inquiry results concerning the viewing of the court's father in the first instance court's decision, the purport of the whole pleadings," shall be added.

Part 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that "only the descriptions of Evidence Nos. 32-1, 2, 3, and 4 of the evidence No. 32-1, 4, and 62-64 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall read "only the descriptions of Evidence No. 32-1, 32-4," respectively.

The following parts shall be added between the 17th sentence of the first instance and the 11th sentence:

"Aler's main contents of this advertisement and each contract for the sale of this case by the plaintiffs.