logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.11.07 2014나1653
근저당권변경등기말소 등
Text

1.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended as follows:

The defendant shall indicate the attached real estate to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: "Defendant B" in the judgment of the court of first instance is as "Defendant B"; "Defendant A" is as "A"; "Defendant A" in the fourth five pages are as "Defendant A"; "I have a duty to perform the registration of the right to collateral security during the seventh parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel nine parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel nine "the defendant" is as "the defendant"; "the defendant has no duty to cancel or cancel" in the same parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel nine parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel, "the defendant" is as "the defendant" and "the defendant and the defendant" are removed from the right to collateral security," and the plaintiff's right to collateral security is removed from the right to collateral security, and the plaintiff's right to collateral security is removed from the right.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. Since the Defendant’s machinery and equipment of this case were consistent with the instant real estate and became effective as the establishment registration of a mortgage on the instant machinery and equipment, the Defendant was a mortgagee of the instant machinery and equipment prior to the completion of the registration for modification, and the part on the instant machinery and equipment among the Defendant’s registration for modification is not invalid.

arrow