A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who had been in office as a director of the victim C-A-A-B-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U

Around May 18, 2018, the Defendant entered into a contract to install a publicity tower on a vehicle with a single ton of “D” and embezzled by consuming KRW 700,000 to the E bank account (F) for the purpose of remodeling costs around the 26th of the same month for the purpose of personal use, such as living expenses, around that time, while he/she was in custody for the victim. From the above date to October 10, 2018, the Defendant embezzled by consuming KRW 24,50,000 for personal use while being transferred more than six times from the above date and time to October 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Written consent to provide financial transaction information;

1. Investigation reports (with respect to places of consumption of damaged sources), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports (person with reference H telephone communications);

1. Relevant statutory provisions on criminal facts, Articles 356 and 355(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment, the reasons for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommending punishment] [the scope] the basic area ( April to January 14) of the type 1 (the scope of less than KRW 100 million) of embezzlement and breach of trust: No special person: (a) has an attitude to recognize and reflect all of the defendant's mistake (decision of sentencing]. However, even though the defendant did not pay damages up to now, the sentence shall be determined as per the order, comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions as indicated in the arguments, such as the defendant