logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.12 2013가합554956
보증금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 12, 2008, the Public Procurement Service contracted the instant prime contractor contract and the instant prime contractor contract. On February 12, 2008, the Public Procurement Service contracted the construction project to the Southern Construction Co., Ltd. and the Namyang Construction Co., Ltd. for the extension of the roads (three tools) and carried out the primary and secondary construction project. The construction project was completed on June 11, 2010 due to the financial situation and statutory management of the said Company.

B) After August 2, 2010, the Plaintiff constituted a joint supply and demand company with Red Construction General Co., Ltd., and the Plaintiff is from the Public Procurement Service around August 2, 2010, the construction project for expanding the roads in the same line (hereinafter “instant prime contract construction project”).

A) A total contract amount of KRW 43,439,220,000 was contracted. The construction is a long-term continuing construction contract, which is a long-term continuing construction contract, and a construction contract was concluded for each type of car (hereinafter “instant prime contract contract”).

2) On February 14, 2012, 201, 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 8. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 8. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20, 201, 200 . 8. 30, 205 . 10. 20, 206 . 1. 30, 201 . 1. 30, 201 . 1. 30, 205 . 204 . 20. 8. 20, 201

As between the prime contract works of this case, the construction works of earth and drainage and structures (hereinafter referred to as “instant subcontracted works”) are deemed to be the subcontracted works of this case.

contract amount 3,483,370.

arrow