A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2013, at around 19:50, the Defendant discovered the fact that he handled the case of 112 reported vehicle by installing a patrol vehicle at the street located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 571-1, while leaving the patrol vehicle, and without any reason, purchased the patrol vehicle from the said C and D, and stated that the Defendant “C and D are removed before he throw away from the spacking the spack.” In doing so, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report of 112 reported by the police officer on the following grounds: (a) he saw that “Nex who was worn with spacking the spack and spacking the spack; and (b) he embling the 10th of the spack of the 10th of the 10th of the spack.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties (finite to June 1 and April), the basic area (finite to June 1) (finite to make a decision of sentence] the defendant's wrong recognition and reflects the defendant's wrong recognition, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances leading to the instant crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the Disposition