The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (20 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. While the defendant was in dispute with the victim D who is a partner, the victim was killed twice with knife that the victim would report the victim's knife to the police on the charge of fraud. The victim's knife knife with the defect that the knife would have reported the victim's knife to the police, the victim's knife cannot be blifeed, and the victim's suffering and flife with the victim's knife cannot be blife, and the bereaved family would be suffering from a big situation that makes it difficult for the victim to live together. The defendant tried to conceal his criminal act by sending the victim's spouse and knife with the victim's knife who was living, and the victim's knife did not completely recover the victim's knife the victim's knife's knife's knife.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and seriously reflects the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of the offense, means and method of the offense, contents and result of the offense, the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as circumstances after the offense, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. Conclusion.