The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (25 years of imprisonment, confiscation) imposed by the lower court on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant committed the instant crime by taking a talk about the sexual intercourse with another male by taking advantage of his motive from the victim living together with him, and there are extenuating circumstances such as the Defendant’s knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife,

However, the instant crime was destroyed by the Defendant’s knife the knife of the victim, knife the victim’s knife with knife with knife on several occasions, and then knife the victim’s knife with knife on the body. As such, the most serious result of the Defendant’s violation of life, which is the most respected value that the State and society should protect, is also poor.

In addition, it is not possible to measure the suffering and suppression of the victims who have deprivedly deprived of their lives as such, and the bereaved families also seem to have suffered a large amount of suffering that could not be able to enjoy throughout their lives, and the bereaved families want to make a strict punishment against the defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take any measures to recover damage.

Therefore, it is inevitable to punish the defendant accordingly.

In full view of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s age, family relation, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, circumstances after the crime was committed, and the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, together with the aforementioned circumstances, the lower court’s sentence imposed on the Defendant.