1. The defendant's KRW 1,200,00 for each of the plaintiffs and 5% per annum from January 15, 2020 to November 27, 2020, respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs are (tentative name) K Regional Housing Association (hereinafter “instant Association”)’s promoters, and the Defendant is the representative director of L Company, and L is the company that was selected as an executor from the said Regional Housing Association.

B. On August 2016, the Defendant prepared a letter of resolution on August 25, 2016, stating that “A person who was recommended by B as the representative of the instant association was selected as a full-time member,” at the office of Kimpo-Spo Office, and submitted the letter of false resolution to the public official in charge when applying for the identification number of the instant association at Kimpo-General, stating the name as if M and the Plaintiffs were present at the above resolution and affixing seals thereto, and then forging it.

C. On December 2016, the Defendant prepared a written resolution of December 26, 2016 to the effect that “N recommended by members D was selected as a new representative of the instant association in full value at the office of the Kimpo-Spo Office,” and then submitted a forged written resolution to the public official in charge upon entering the name as if the Plaintiffs, other than M and Plaintiff A were present at the above resolution, and affixing a seal on the lower end of the above written resolution, and then forged it. In the Kimpo-U, the Defendant reported the correction of the identification number of the instant association at the Kimpo-ri Office, and submitted the forged written resolution to the public official in charge as if it were a document duly formed.

The defendant received a summary order of KRW 5 million due to the fabrication of private documents and the uttering of private documents as stated in the above 2 and 3.

(Reasons for recognition) The fact that there is no dispute, the entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant forged the resolution letter in the name of the plaintiffs and received the unique number of the union of this case. The above act is under the Civil Act.