The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On June 28, 2012, the Defendant entered “C”, “D”, “D”, “C”, and “C” in the name column of the written meeting and the written resolution in the name column of the commission of executive officers and representatives at an unclaimed place on or around June 28, 2012 for the purpose of uttering, and entered “C” in the name column of the right holder and affixed the C’s seal in the name column and forged one copy of the “written meeting and written resolution.” 2) The Defendant entered “E”, “F”, “F”, “E”, and “E” in the name column of the written meeting and written resolution at an unclaimed place on or around June 28, 2012, and forged one copy of the “written meeting and written resolution” in the name column of the right holder’s name.

B. On June 28, 2012, the Defendant issued two copies of the forged “written reference and written resolution” as referred to in the foregoing paragraph (a) to H, which is, around June 28, 2012, put in the custody of election ballot papers for the withdrawal of the enforcement schedule of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western G reconstruction Project Association.

2. In this Court, the Defendant did not have forged his/her written reference and resolution in the name of C and E, and does not know whether the forged document in the name of C and E is included in the written reference and resolution of other union members delivered by the Defendant to H.

The following circumstances shown in the record, namely, ① in this court, C and E stated that it was entirely unaware of whether the “written reference and resolution” forged in its name was actually prepared and submitted; ② in this court, H did not know of whether it was submitted by the Defendant a forged document reference and resolution in the name of C and E, and the Defendant submitted multiple copies of the written reference and resolution in the name of another union members.