1. The plaintiff and the defendant, who submitted the real estate stated in the separate sheet to an auction and deducted the auction cost from the price.

In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the attached real estate is recognized as co-ownership of the plaintiff and the defendants (the share of co-ownership: the plaintiff, the defendant C 2/7, and the defendant B 3/7) and it is recognized that there was no agreement on the method of partition among co-owners, and in addition to the above facts, if the above facts are divided into the above real estate in kind in consideration of the fact that the value might be reduced, the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the above real estate shall be sold to auction and the plaintiff and the defendant C shall be distributed to 2/7 and the defendant B at the ratio of 3/7.