1.each real estate listed in the separate sheet is put to an auction and the remainder after deducting the auction cost from the price.

In full view of the contents of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number), and the purport of all the arguments, it may be acknowledged that the agreement on the method of dividing the article jointly owned by each real estate listed in the separate sheet was not reached. Although defendant N wanting to divide the article jointly owned by kind for the above real estate, in light of the location and size of each of the above real estate as known by the evidence and the purport of the whole pleadings, it is reasonable to deem that each of the above real estate could not be divided in kind in kind or that its value might be significantly reduced due to the division.

Therefore, it is reasonable to divide the property jointly owned by means of distributing the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the price of each of the above real property sold by auction in accordance with the share ratio of co-owners, so it is so decided as per Disposition.