1. The plaintiff shall sell the real estate listed in the separate sheet to an auction and deduct the auction cost from the price.

1. The facts of recognition are as shown in the annexed sheet of claims and the changed causes of claims;

[Reasons for Recognition]

A. Defendant D, F, G, and H: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Act

(b) Defendant E: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. In light of the location, area, use status, value and use status of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, use status, relationship between co-owners, and attitude in which co-owners are showing the division of the real estate of this case, it is inappropriate for co-owners to divide the real estate of this case according to their shares, and the efficiency of the land is to be reduced if the real estate is divided in kind.

Attached Form

The plaintiffs who own 253/583 shares of each of the real estate listed in the list want to divide the price by auction, and the defendants do not raise any objection as to the method of selling and dividing the sale price by selling the real estate listed in the attached list to auction.

In addition, considering the background leading up to the filing of the lawsuit in this case and all the circumstances revealed in the argument in this case, it is reasonable to distribute the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the price by selling the real estate in this case to the auction, to the respective shares of the plaintiffs and the

3. Conclusion, the real estate of this case is sold to an auction, and the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the sale price is divided in proportion to each co-ownership share, and the lawsuit cost is assessed against each party. It is so decided as per Disposition.