Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged reveals that the Defendant bullyingd with the victim B from February 2016 to June 2016 by sending letters to the effect that the Defendant hedginged on July 20 of the same year, and thereby, was frightening with the victim.
On July 15, 2016, the Defendant sent the text message to the same purport to the victim 31 times during the period from around 12:59 to December 23, 2016, and repeatedly sent the victim the text that arouses fear or apprehension by sending the text message to the victim 31 times in total, as indicated in the attached crime sight table, such as sending the text message to the bus company’s team leader, which is the most good example, such as sending the text message.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 74 (2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;
B. On September 13, 2017, after the institution of the instant indictment, a written withdrawal of the complaint stating that the victim B does not want to be punished against the Defendant.
Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act