A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A thief: (a) around 17:00 on January 12, 2019, the Defendant: (b) called “A” to the victim D, who had been working at the place in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, stating that “A mobile phone has no mobile phone; (c) a mobile phone has been cut off from the victim; and (d) the victim got a cell phone from the victim; and (d) the victim provided the customer with the cell phone, thereby taking off one e- card owned by the victim, which was in the cell phone case by taking advantage of the gaps of surveillance negligence.

2. On January 12, 2019, at around 18:05, the Defendant violated the Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act purchased female clothes (one panty 2) from the victim’s name-free G in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and presented the stolen E card as if he was the Defendant’s physical card, and paid 50,000 won after having received clothes from the victim, and acquired them by fraud, and used a stolen physical card.

From that time until 20:23 of the same day, the Defendant received the total amount of KRW 695,100 from 10 to 10 times as indicated in the attached list of crimes in the same manner, and used stolen check cards.

3. On January 12, 2019, the Defendant attempted to purchase an Aphone X Max 2 at the I mobile phone agency located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul at around 17:56, and to present the E- card that stolen as stated in the above paragraph (1) to an employee at the location as if he was the Defendant’s body card, and to settle the amount of KRW 3,200,000, the Defendant was refused to obtain approval from the victim, but the Defendant attempted to pay KRW 3,000,000 in the same way on the same page, but was refused to pay KRW 1,60,000 in excess of the limit. However, the Defendant refused to grant approval by paying the amount of KRW 1,60,00 in excess of the limit, but was denied to have attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The victim;