The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case, even though the defendant violated the speed limit and the causal relationship between the traffic accident in this case.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The lower court determined based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, and found the following facts: (i) on May 28, 2012, the Defendant driven a taxi at a speed of 81 km above the intersection at a speed of 60 km per hour at the speed of 0:40 meters; (ii) the Defendant’s signal installed at the intersection at the time of the original adjudication was turned on the direction and opposite direction of the Defendant when entering the intersection; (iii) the Defendant was directly entering the intersection at the time of the original adjudication without a speed; (iv) the Defendant violated the Defendant’s duty of care to make a left-hand turn from the front side of the road at the speed of 81km; and (v) the Defendant’s act of violating the Defendant’s duty of care to make a left-hand turn to the left-hand turn from the front side of the instant passenger vehicle due to a green traffic accident at the speed of the front or the left-hand turn to the left-hand side of the instant passenger vehicle.