The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not have committed a mistake in fact against the signal.

B. Even if the Defendant was found guilty of an unreasonable sentencing test, the lower court’s punishment (fine 500,000) is excessively unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the victim made a detailed statement to the effect that "the victim was able to recognize the credibility of the above statement by evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below and the court below, i.e., the victim changed the direction signal, etc. to the second straight line, and changed to the second straight line, while waiting at the same time, and the left turn changed to the second straight line, and the above vehicle was able to stop on a sudden stop (the 37 pages of the investigation record)." According to the statement of traffic accident situation prepared by the defendant (the 18th page of the investigation record), it is not difficult for the defendant to dismiss the credibility of the above statement. According to the above statement of traffic accident situation (the 18th page of the investigation record), it is written that the defendant was able to see the direction of the victim at the same time, and it is not necessary for the victim to enter the intersection as the victim's statement was made in violation of the victim's right-hand direction at the same time.