logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 11. 10. 선고 2011두19505 판결
(심리불속행) 군복무기간은 8년 자경요건의 거주기간에 산입하지 아니함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court 2010Nu6472 (Law No. 13, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2010Da1246 ( October 17, 2010)

Title

(ps) The period of military service shall not be included in the period of residence of a person with respect to the requirements for self-determination for eight years.

Summary

(C) A disposition that excludes capital gains tax reduction or exemption is legitimate, as there is no evidence to prove that the military service period was not included in the period of residence, and it did not meet the requirements of re-resident, and it did not meet the requirements of self-defense for more than

Cases

2011Du19505 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

Park XX

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Suwon Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2010Nu6472 Decided July 13, 2011

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Although examining the judgment below in light of the records of this case, it is recognized that the assertion on the grounds of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,

arrow