(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.02.24 2015고단3164

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.02.24 2015고단3164

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who operated an authorized intermediary office in the name of "real estate" in Ansan-si C commercial building in Ansan-si, and operated a real estate brokerage office. The Defendant concluded a pre-sale contract with the owner of the unit D building in Ansan-si, the owner of the unit F building in Ansan-si, the owner of the unit I, the owner of the unit H building in Ansan-si, and the owner of the unit D building in Ansan-si, the owner of the unit D building in Ansan-si, the owner of the unit J building in Ansan-si, the owner of the building in Ansan-si, the owner of the unit M, the owner of the unit 4 units in Ansan-si, the N5th unit owner in Ansan-si, the N5th unit owner in Ansan-si, and the owner of the unit P of Ansan-gu, the head of Ansan-si, who entrusted the Defendant with the authority to conclude the monthly lease contract, and received the maximum amount of deposit for the lease contract, and committed the crime of fraud by means of fraud, etc.

1. Crimes relating to Qua of the victim;

A. On March 15, 201, the Defendant was delegated with the authority to conclude a monthly rent contract by E, the owner of the said D building, and the Defendant was delegated with the authority to conclude a monthly rent contract by the owner of the said D building, even though he/she did not have been entrusted with the authority to conclude a rent contract, the Defendant was delegated to the victim by the owner of the right to conclude a pre-sale lease contract for the operation of D building.

On March 31, 2011, the said real estate office acquired cash of KRW 30 million as the deposit money from the victim on the following grounds: (a) the said office received cash of KRW 30 million from the victim on March 31, 201; (b) the said office received cash of KRW 30 million in the name of the deposit money.

B. Counterfeiting of private documents and 1) The Defendant in the part of the forgery and uttering of a pre-tax agreement, as well as the forgery of the pre-tax agreement, made the above victim believe that the pre-tax agreement was normally concluded. On March 15, 2011.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.03.13 2014고단124

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.09.08 2017고합26

-서울서부지방법원 2018.12.12 2018고단3385

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.10.26 2016고단4451

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.02.02 2016가단18920