Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the same shall apply for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates “D (Internet trade name E)” on the 5th floor in light time, and Defendant B is an employee of the said establishment.

From November 10, 2019 to October 17:00 of the same month, the Defendants equipped with 8 smuggling rooms, 2 shower rooms, 2 waiting rooms for female employees, 1 room, and CCTV, and advertised sexual traffic advertisements with the trade name of “E” to the “F,” which is a commercial sex trade advertising site, and allowed male customers who reported and contacted with it to enter the above business site. After receiving the fee of 8-160,00 won for each course, the Defendants provided guidance to the smuggling to have sexual intercourse with female employees.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement (as to Defendant A)

1. Part of the witness A’s legal statement (defendant B)

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. A written statement by Defendant B (Evidence Nos. 4)

1. On-site photographs [The defendant B and his defense counsel asserted that he did not have worked as an employee of the business place in the judgment, but the defendant B's written statement (the defendant B's statement was received from the customer who was found in the business place and sent out a female employee), the defendant A's prosecutor's statement (the defendant B was called as the office leader at the business place, cleaning the customer's guidance and the receipt of commercial sex acts) and Gap reversed the prosecutor's statement that the defendant B appeared as a witness and worked in the business place, but the prosecutor's statement that the defendant B worked in the business place was reversed, and the defendant B did not have any unfavorable reasons. The defendant B's statement that "I did not provide board and lodging for 200,000 won per month from 1 week to 10 days prior to the control of the friendly defendant B, and (the defendant A did not provide board and lodging for the defendant B)." The defendant B did not have any intention to refuse the proposal, and he made a statement that he did not have any reasons to the defendant B's statement.