1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, Defendant C, Defendant C, KRW 5,676,652, and each of the said money from October 1, 2009 to May 1, 2014.

Basic Facts

Defendant C had previously obtained E's driver's license prior to the occurrence of the traffic accident, and Defendant C asked D to use the car rental fee by requesting D's siren.

D On February 15, 2009, the F car was sirened without giving notice that it was a minor by stealing the driver's license of the non-party E in Franchis.

D delivered the said car to Defendant C.

On February 15, 2009, Defendant C, with a driver’s license, moved Defendant A and G to the said car for the purpose of travel, and started as a prisoner of war on the draft.

During the Do, Defendant A did not have a driver's license but want to have Defendant C drive in the first instance without a driver's license, and Defendant C transferred the car driving vehicle to Defendant A.

At around 19:00 on February 15, 2009, Defendant A, while driving the said vehicle, she shocked the central separation zone from the point below the Western Highway 100.93km to the care of the vice-speak, reconcing the right diver and reconcing the right diver into approximately 10 weeks to Nonparty G, who is a passenger, for about 10 weeks of treatment.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident.” The Defendants and D are inter-friendly, and all minors were minors at the time of the instant accident.

The Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds and partially repaid Defendant A is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with the insurance period from January 3, 2009 to September 24, 2009 with respect to the said car.

After offsetting negligence as the victim of the instant accident, the Plaintiff paid KRW 28,383,260 to G as medical expenses, consolation money, and other damages by September 30, 2009.

Defendant A repaid 2 million won to the Defendant by April 29, 2009.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings.

Judgment

According to the fact that the establishment of joint tort liability claim is established, D receives the request of the defendant C.