logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.06.17 2018가단52184
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A in KRW 90,802,573, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant D acquired a lost driver’s license on July 17, 2017.

B. Around 22:00 on July 20, 2017, Defendant D presented the said G’s driver’s license, and concluded a vehicle lease agreement with Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant E”) on the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) during the lease period from July 20, 2017 to July 22:10, and KRW 70,000 with respect to the instant vehicle under the name of G (hereinafter “Defendant E”), and leased the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

C. At around 21:55 on July 23, 2017, Defendant D driven the instant vehicle without a car driver’s license and brought the instant part of the LCA 100 U.S. Operation’s full part, which was left left pursuant to the new subparagraph, into the part of the instant vehicle driver’s seat, without violating the suspension signal at the front intersection of J High School and J High School.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff A suffered injuries, such as salleys, sakes, sakes, etc.

E. Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, Defendant E is the owner of the instant vehicle, and Defendant FF Financial Cooperative (hereinafter “Defendant FF Financial Cooperative”) is the mutual aid implementer who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with Defendant E with respect to the instant vehicle.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above recognition of the Defendants’ liability for damages, the instant accident occurred due to negligence, such as Defendant D’s violation of signalling.

As such, Defendant D is the driver of the instant vehicle, Defendant E is the owner of the instant vehicle, and the Defendant E is the beneficiary of the instant vehicle, and the Defendant Mutual Aid Association shares the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident.

arrow