logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.01.25 2016가합32858
기사삭제 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a professor affiliated with the D University Information Technical College Information Technology Engineering and Technology Engineering in C, and Defendant Lotien Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Lotien”) is a broadcasting company that engages in the production, supply, etc. of a comprehensive news program, and an Internet broadcasting business entity that reports news via a website (www.ytn.co.kr), and Defendant B is a reporter affiliated with Defendant Lotien.

B. Defendant 1’s report, as indicated in attached Form 1 through 4, mainly four times, read that “the Plaintiff, a professor of the Republic of Korea, embezzled the industry-academic cooperation subsidy to be borne by the Plaintiff and started the audit by the Ministry of Education.” Defendant 1, as indicated in attached Form 5 through 8, mainly reported four times on October 12, 10, including that “the Plaintiff, along with the above suspicions, plagiarism the Plaintiff’s patent, plagiarism, and had a third party implement research projects related to the Plaintiff’s husband’s major, who is a professor of the same university,” and that “the Plaintiff embezzled the labor expenses, etc. of the third party even before the period of audit currently in progress,” and published each of the above news reports by Defendant 2, etc. on the Internet site as indicated in attached Form 5 through 8.

(hereinafter the above broadcast reports and articles are collectively referred to as "the article of this case"). 【No dispute exists with the ground of recognition, entry of Gap Nos. 1 and 4 (including virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Defendants, through the instant article, made significant and significant infringement on the Plaintiff’s reputation by expressing the following false facts, on the Internet site of the above Defendant’s Internet site based on the right of personality.

arrow