1. The defendant Cheonghuri Co., Ltd.:

A. Editorials issued within seven days from the date of the final determination of the instant judgment.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a “C Training Institute” (hereinafter “instant Training Institute”) which is a youth training facility located in Chungcheongbuk-gun B (hereinafter “instant Training Institute”).

(2) The Defendant Cheonguri Broadcasting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Cheonguri Broadcasting”) is a newspaper enterpriser publishing a periodical called “ Chungcheong interview,” and the Defendant Chungcheong News Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Chungcheong News”) is an Internet newspaper enterpriser who reports the news on the website (http:/cines.co., Ltd.). operating the website.

B. Report 1 of the Defendants’ news articles 1) Defendant Chungcheong News is an article of the title “E,” “F,” “B,” “B,” and “H” (hereinafter “instant article”) at the social education level of the D Chungcheong News website.

(2) The Defendant had an interview with the content as indicated in the 5 original report, which is identical to that of the instant article. (3) The Defendant had an interview with the content as shown in the 5 original report, on the one page, 4 through 7 pages, I had an interview with the interview with the content as shown in the 5 original report.

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion refers to: (a) there is suspicion that the Plaintiff has committed a collusion with L Training Institute in the course of participating in a competitive bid on R services (hereinafter “proced fact-finding ①”); and (b) a school-related person enter into a R service contract with an external intermediary, as well as employees belonging to a business training facility, and pays part of the training expenses to the said intermediary, etc. for brokerage fees.

In other words, inappropriate business activities are conducted (hereinafter “inappropriate facts”), and (3) during the training activities of students, teachers’ accommodation is assigned separately from students, provide food and alcoholic beverages, and are not present for training activities.

(hereinafter referred to as "proced facts") has damaged the reputation of the Plaintiff by preparing and posting the article of this case where the false facts, such as the facts, were stated.