logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.05.02 2016고단2594
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and eight months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Gwangju District Court on April 17, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was terminated in the Gwangju District Court on June 29, 2015. On December 30, 2014, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for a year and six months in the same court on December 30, 2014 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju District Court on January 15, 2016.

After searching the gold banks located in F with E, the Defendants conspired with E to obtain the gold bullion price from the G white BM car located in F, and as if the Defendants were to enter the gold room and finish the gold bar in the middle of 18 km as if they were the gold bar, and if they were to sell it and have cash, the Defendants conspired to obtain the gold bar price from the gold bank with the smallest size of low capacity to distinguish precious metal by means of getting off and getting off the said car.

1. Fraud [2016 Highest 2594] Defendants conspired with E, and received a total of KRW 37 million from the Defendants, as shown in the List of Crimes I, five times until November 26, 2016, a total of KRW 605,00,00, which was calculated as the 18km from the Internet, in collusion with E, by the victim I operated by the victim I in Southern-Gun H on November 15, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendants acquired the above 3,370,000 won in collusion with E.

2. Attempted fraud (2016 Height 2594).

A. In collusion with the Defendants, around November 26, 2016, the victim’s L/C in Bosung-gun K located in Nam-gun, Nam-gun around November 26, 2016, the Defendants were false as if they were to look at the victim’s lab and dispose of the victim’s lab because it was difficult for the victim to live. However, the Defendants did not sell a lab on the wind to find out that the victim’s lab was against the lab.

arrow