The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who operates DNA-free telecom with the previous YY-si C.

Although an accommodation business operator is not allowed to engage in any business which disturbs public morals by placing his/her employees or having other persons with an identification card to verify the age of the visitors and having them see their authenticity, he/she is not allowed to engage in any business which disturbs public morals by allowing male and female juveniles to sleep together with other persons. However, the Defendant did not have any of the above facilities and the Defendant’s total of four persons, including E (the remaining, the age of 18) and F (the age of 18), who are juveniles from September 9, 2017 to 08:55 on the same day, were engaged in any business which disturbs public morals by allowing them to sleep together in the above-mentioned youth 605 room.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor was intentional to the Defendant, recognizing that the Defendant would make the juvenile familiarly and well-known as shown in the facts charged.

It is insufficient to recognize.

(a) Dless persons operated by the Defendant shall be operated in a manner that sets up a room in which guests want to enter an unmanned machine and pays accommodation charges on the card or cash, and receives the key and enables them to be accommodated in the room in question;

The defendant may confirm the form of accommodation through CCTV.

B. A male juvenile E and G entered around September 9, 2017, around 06:00, around 605, around 2017.

Defendant 1 confirmed that all of the above juveniles are male, and did not separately confirm their identification cards, etc.

around 06:10, the Defendant: “A person who prevented the toilet change” from the above juveniles was called 605 and went to 605; even in that case, there were only the above male juveniles in 605.

(c)

Two women who are not juveniles, such as F, were enrolled in the above 605 around 06:30.

The defendant does not check CCTV at the time of cleaning, etc. in investigative agencies and this court.