logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.06.08 2018고정225
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant charged with the instant facts charged is a person who runs a telecom with the trade name of “D” in the Guns C.

No person shall engage in any business which disturbs public morals or provide a place for such business by permitting male and female juveniles to sleep together with other persons, and any accommodation business operator shall place his/her employees or verify the age of persons engaged in accommodation with the facilities, etc. prescribed by Presidential Decree and shall restrict juveniles from having access if it is likely to disturb public morals, such as permitting juveniles to sleep together with male and female persons.

Nevertheless, on September 23, 2017, the Defendant engaged in a business activity that disturbs public morals by putting juveniles E (n, female, 16 years of age) together with F (22 years of age) who is adult male.

2. On the ground that the Defendant, at the time of the instant case, was unable to perform his/her administrative duties under the Act on the Protection of Juveniles (amended by the Act on the Protection of Juveniles) and provided equipment to enable access by juveniles, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant, around September 23, 2017, was aware of the fact that he/she was well informed of the fact that he/she was well aware of, around September 12:30, 2017, youth E (the age of 16) and the adult male F (the age of 22), and that he/she managed the telecom on behalf of the Defendant at the time of the instant case.

G In the middle half of September 2017, the middle half of the 2017 period, the G was thought to be a mixed customer, considering that it was impossible to ascertain whether the vehicle had been memoryd as soon as possible, but it was not possible to verify whether it was in the vehicle, and that it was possible to open the vehicle by telephone, and that it was changed in several times.

In light of the fact that the statement (Evidence No. 138 of the evidence record) and the third-story management office of this case installed an integrated monitor connected to 7 CCTV units and only access vehicles can be confirmed through a monitor, etc., the defendant will be a criminal intent to have juveniles and adults shared.

arrow