Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

B is the relationship with the deceased C, and the defendant is the person who was a guest with the inspection operated by B.

Around 10:00 on April 18, 2018, B at the funeral hall of the hospital E to prepare a letter of delegation in the name C, and the Defendant conspired to issue a false certificate of the personal seal impression in the name of the deceased C, referring to the fact that he/she was the deceased C when he/she confirms the certificate of the personal seal impression in the Dong office.

1. At around 13:01 on April 18, 201, 201, Gdong Office located in F at Chungcheong City: (a) even though there was no fact that the Gdong Office was entrusted with the issuance of a certificate of the personal seal impression from the deceased C, the delegating column among the power of attorney was voluntarily prepared; and (b) seal was affixed on the side of his/her name using C painting, who was a person living together.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, forged a letter of delegation to issue a certificate of seal imprint for the purpose of exercising rights and duties.

2. The Defendant, in collusion with B, delivered the power of proxy to issue a certificate of seal impression as stated in paragraph (1) at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1) to H in the Gdong Office where he did not know that the document was forged, and exercised it as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Register to issue certificates of seal imprint;

1. Application of statutes governing delegations to issue certificates of seal imprint;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 231 and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234, 231, and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with the punishment determined for the uttering of a relevant investigation document heavier than the hostage) among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the defendant.