logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.06 2015나66013
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs reside in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment (hereinafter "D apartment") 303, and the defendant is residing in D apartment 403.

B. On December 2011, Plaintiff B was dismissed from the manager (the leader) of the D Apartment and the Defendant was elected as the successor manager (the leader), the Plaintiffs suffered various inequalitys and conflicts between the Defendant and the Defendant’s family members, including collection of management expenses, management of public funds, etc.

C. On April 2013, the Defendant entered the 2nd page of the A4-site 2 with the intention of informing the residents of the plaintiffs' actual condition (hereinafter referred to as the "in this case") in the printed matter (hereinafter referred to as "in this case"), and disposed of wastes more than once a day at each location while entering and leaving the CCTV, using spits, electric spits, spits, and string down in an elevator, walking down in a stringr, washing down in an elevator, falling down in a stringr, falling down in a 2nd floor and down in an elevator, and cut down in a stringr, and cut down in a stringr, and cut down in a 150,000 won (hereinafter referred to as "the 2nd page 150,000 won). The purpose of the Defendant applied for the business registration to the 2nd page 2012, Plaintiff A opened his office of management in his office and distributed it to the head of the 1500,00,00,000 won (hereinafter referred to 2nd).

The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 for the above facts constituting an offense in Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 1628.

An appeal or appeal by the defendant against this.

arrow