The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who works as the head of the Ban in the Southern-gu B apartment at the time of capture of the facts charged, and the victim C is a person who resides in the above apartment No. 4.

On January 21, 2019, the Defendant, although the fact in the above apartment, did not pay apartment management fees for eight months, destroyed the personal character and reputation of the head of the Ban and interfere with the duties of the head of the Ban, the Defendant posted five copies of the above apartment bulletin board of the apartment, “1. Item B: the head of the Ban shall withdraw from office due to the noise and disturbance of the head of the household (D), and the head of the Dong shall intentionally inform the residents of the residents of the neighborhood meeting of the details of B apartment construction (waste) by intentionally impairing the management fees and the duties of the head of the Ban for eight months during which the head of the household did not pay the apartment management fees for eight months, and thereby impairing the personal character and reputation of the head of the Ban by making a false operation on the apartment bulletin board of the apartment, thereby impairing the head of the Ban and impeding his duties, and thereby, damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out the period of action at the neighborhood meeting by attaching a paper stating “A4.”

2. Grounds;

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act.

C. After the prosecution of this case, a written agreement containing the expression of intention of the victim C not to punish the victim C is submitted.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;