The defendant shall be innocent.

On February 2, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. against D, 2015 order 4800, the lower court, at the court No. 2 of the Daegu District Court, around 16:00, 2016.

In the examination of the above case, the defendant "E at the time has made any speech to the witness in detail" of the defense counsel.

“A person who has been identified as one of the two facts in his / her upper line” in question refers to a person who has been aware of his / her highest and incompetence, so-called humnasty that he / she was aware of his / her humb

The testimony was made in the past, and the prosecutor's "A witness" made a false information about D from E.

Along with the fact that there was a lush lush speech

(B)in the case of the PPS.

The testimony called “...” was made to the question “....”.

However, in fact, there was no fact that the Defendant did not feel D from E.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Judgment

In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, E was written from F and D.

The investigation of the suspicion of the provision of phiphones to F and D was initiated by self-denunciation to investigation agencies, and the fact that F and D were indicted after the provision of phiphones to E was confirmed guilty, E was found guilty due to the administration of phiphones provided by F and D, and the defendant testified during the trial of D but the testimony was rejected.

However, in the testimony of the defendant in the above indictment case against D, the defendant's testimony from E, and one of the two persons who reported two persons in relation to the philophones was hyeed by E, and the one who received the philophones from F is a false information.

In light of the above facts of recognition, it is doubtful that the testimony of the defendant is false.