A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2017, from around 18:30 on May 1, 201 to around 18:45 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with his duties to E, etc., the employees of the security team of the above hospital in the emergency room of the victim D hospital located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “the victim D”).

C. By threatening the employees of the above hospital and other patients, it interfered with the medical treatment of the above hospital by threatening the above hospital, such as flusium, flusium, and flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, i.e., flusium flusium, flusium

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, took a bath on the ground that the victim G (the 41-year old age) was required to return home to the Defendant, who was sent out after receiving a report of 112 at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and was asked to leave the victim’s right blue part of the victim’s blue blue, which was removed, thereby making it impossible to identify the number of treatment days.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement of E and H;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Sentence the same sentence as the disposition is imposed in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing, including the following: (a) failure to agree with the victims of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) confession is contrary to contingent crimes; (c) the primary offender; and (d) the Defendant’s age, family environment; and (e) the motive and background of the