1. The Defendant’s disciplinary action for three months of suspension from office against the Plaintiff on June 21, 2018 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 2001, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as an assistant professor of the National Special University B, a national special university on October 1, 2008, and was appointed as a regular professor on October 1, 2008, and held office as C and C of the above school for about about 17 years and six months until February 28, 2019.

The Plaintiff’s sexual harassment during class hours 1) concentrating on the outer line, and concentrating on the structure of the male, it is necessary for women to concentrate on the outer line. Women are frighten and concentrating on only the unfolding line. Women are concentrating only on the dissection of the male. They are concentrating only on the autopsy. males are concentrating on the structure more and more, and separately talked on the division of men and women (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason A-1”).

(2) The Plaintiff made a statement to the effect that “If there is a male and female fluor in the class of February 2017, the Plaintiff made a statement that “if there is a male and female fluor, a male and female fluor may sit above the female fluor.”

(3) The Plaintiff’s statement that, during the class hours in 2017, only one of the students was made up of the music video of the G-2017 (hereinafter “A-2 disciplinary action”), and the Plaintiff made a statement that, “I may do so on any day. I do not have to do so. I do not have to do so. I do not have to do so. I do not have to do so. I do not have to do so. I do not have to do so. I may obtain me. I can obtain me.” (hereinafter “A-3 disciplinary action”), and in addition to the grounds for the disciplinary action set forth in paragraphs (a-1) and (2).” (hereinafter “A-3 disciplinary action”).

B. B. D’s indecent act damage case (hereinafter “instant cause”)

- On August 17, 2011, the Plaintiff was engaged in the affairs at a promise place (D writers) with a view to raising hand on the buckbucks, placing hand on the spucks, and placing hand on the spucks inside the sprink, and moved on the spacks (not in the string structure, but in the string structure). The Plaintiff asked whether male and spacks on the 2 name and spacks, and asked whether the spacks and spacks are considered.

The plaintiff asked the example to the plaintiff, is refused due to the schedule, and is going through further dialogue.