The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal reveals that the court below rejected the credibility of the witness G, F, and H’s statements and the statements made by the on-site police officer, who directly experienced the witness G, F, and H, in conformity with their statements, and erred by misapprehending the legal principles on willful negligence in relation to the violation of the Juvenile Protection Act.

2. The lower court rendered a not-guilty verdict on the facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

In addition to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below for the reasons indicated in the judgment below, the court below was just to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on the facts charged for the reasons indicated in the judgment, and it is hard to find a mistake by misapprehending the legal principles as to willful negligence.

The Prosecutor’s assertion is difficult to accept.

G stated in the court of the court below that “G, F, E, H, and I were accommodated in the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and written in the Ministry of Health and Welfare in the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and I. They did not have any room separately. They did not have any knife (math). A male was knife and female knife, and two male and female knife were knife. A female knife. In one room, two male and female knife were tried to have been tried separately, and kn

(No. 65, 66, 70 of the trial record) H stated in the court of the original instance that “two women at the time, two men, three men, and two rooms, respectively.”

(No. 124,125 of the trial record) The statement submitted by F to the police is written as follows: “E heading and D two heading rooms were borrowed; E heading f was pro-gu G was locked, and N entered into the police and went into the police.”

(Evidence Records 11) Even based on the above statements made by G, H, and F, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant provided a place for the purpose of the business of eternal divorce to juveniles.

B. F stated in the lower court’s court that “F entered the country when the Defendant was unable to find a job.”

(78 pages of the trial record) F enters the court below's order.