beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by fine of KRW 4,000,000, respectively.
The defendants are the defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
E, in the case of “work-based credit loans” handled by a lending company during the city, using the fact that the loan evaluation is not strict compared to other loans, etc., the personal credit rating is low or there is no other asset so that the lending of a financial institution is impossible in a normal way, and the lending of a financial institution is forged documents necessary for the lending, and some of them are collected from the applicants for the lending with a fee.
1. On December 11, 2013, Defendant A visited A’s social loan company (hereinafter “C&C”) company with a computer located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si’s transfer-dong using a certified certificate issued in the name of Defendant A (hereinafter “C&C”), and Defendant A prepared and submitted an application for credit loan as if Defendant A was an employee of F.C., and then, Defendant A forged a bank transaction statement between three months as Defendant A received monthly salary from F.C., and Defendant A responded to his questioning as if he was an employee of F.C. upon receipt of the phone call from the said Russian loan company. Defendant A responded to his questioning as if Defendant A was an employee of F.C.
However, in fact, Defendant A did not receive a regular monthly wage because he was not a stock company F employee, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan.
Defendant
A and the above E, as such, deceiving a loan employee in Russn IWn, received 7,700,000 won from the victim Russn City to transfer the same day, and by the same method around October 7, 2014, accused A, as if Defendant A was an employee who received a regular benefit from G, by deceiving Defendant A as if he was an employee who received a regular benefit from G, and defrauded KRW 17,770,000 won in total on the same day.
2. Defendant B’s above is located in the area where, around October 14, 2014, Defendant B knew of the trade name in the area of the wife population Kim Yang-dong.