All appeals by the plaintiffs against the defendants are dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiffs

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted by this court is additionally examined

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the addition of the following, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

No. 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed.

Then, even if there were some difficulties in Plaintiff A’s rental business or Plaintiff B’s street store business due to the parking of the Defendants, there is insufficient proof of the occurrence of damages as claimed by the Plaintiffs.

In addition, "No. 7 of the first instance judgment" is in a non-joint and several relationship.

The plaintiff paid KRW 234,00,00 with a recording fee, KRW 234,00 with a stamp, service fee, KRW 248,40,00 in the appellate court, and KRW 248,40 with a stamp, service fee, and KRW 248,40 in the appellate court. The plaintiff Eul argued to the effect that the defendant's act was shocked by the defendants and suspended business for 4 months, and the damage should be increased as the damage was reflected in the operation after the above cancer diagnosis. However, the stamp, etc. cannot be deemed as a damage with a causal relationship with the defendants' tort, apart from being subject to the litigation cost. The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone is insufficient to acknowledge the causal relationship between the defendants' act, the suspension of business and the operation of the plaintiff Eul, and there is no other evidence to prove this otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' above assertion cannot be accepted.

"in addition".

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and all appeals against the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.