beta
Text
All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance 1. Part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus cite it as it is by the main text of
2. The court's explanation on this part of the parties' assertion is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for any dismissal or addition as follows.
7th of the first instance judgment, “11,797,00 won” (i.e., 76,50,000 CCTV installation cost of KRW 297,00,000 for security service) and “73,485,800 for each of the following items” (i.e., attorney fees of KRW 15,582,00 for attorney fees of KRW 50,000 for each of the above litigation proceedings) are added to “11,79,00 for each of the following items” (i.e., attorney fees of KRW 15,582,00 for each of the above litigation proceedings).
In the 8th instance judgment of the first instance, the Defendant’s “Plaintiff B” in front of the Defendant’s “Defendant”, “Plaintiff B” in front of the 6th instance judgment, “Interference with the 8th instance judgment” (hereinafter “act of interfering with the Plaintiff B’s worship”) and “the Defendant’s “act of interference with the Plaintiff’s worship” in the 10th instance judgment,” “In addition, the Defendants asserted Plaintiff B’s pastor and requested to dispatch temporary wood to the local councils affiliated with the J religious organization,” and “the Defendant damaged the 18th instance judgment” (hereinafter “Defendant’s defamation act against Plaintiff B,” and “the Plaintiff’s defamation act” in the 9th instance judgment, and “the Plaintiff’s defamation act” in the 9th instance judgment (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s defamation act against the Plaintiff”) and “the Defendant’s defamation act of the Plaintiff” in the 3rd instance of the 3rd instance judgment.