1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts added, thereby citing it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added to the 5th page 11 of the judgment of the first instance.

[However, Plaintiff A paid a surcharge imposed in the above judgment and filed a later request for correction as stipulated in Article 45-2(2) of the Framework Act on National Taxes, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2014Du5514, Jul. 16, 2015)] Article 6-9 of the first judgment of the court of first instance added “Evidence 3 and 4” after adding “Evidence 3 and 4.”

The following shall be added to 7 pages 2 of the judgment of the first instance.

(M) In doing so, E’s representative director E of the instant legal entity refers to “a set at a higher price in terms of the incentives requested by the Plaintiff A,” and “F, which entered into a consulting agreement with the instant legal entity, stated that “A does not do so to others as part of the Plaintiff’s failure to interfere with and interfere with others.” The following is added to the following: (a) the first instance judgment 7th six parallels of the 1st instance judgment:

(A) The examination of all evidence submitted by Plaintiff B, including evidence Nos. 17 through 25, does not recognize that Plaintiff B spent expenses for its implementation according to the instant sales contract)

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.