logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.28 2016고단5182
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

35,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On August 11, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 7, 2017.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant, “2016 Highest 5182,” was a person who was a party to whom he/she had worked as the chairperson of the Daegu City of Party B, Daegu.

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. From the end of May 2014, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily called “Agreement” on A4 paper on the paper located in Daegu located in the French located in the end of May 2014 on the date of the end of the crime; (b) KRW 100 million; (c) the Defendant granted the right to operate the instant coffee specialty in the C Hospital; and (d) the agreement amount is KRW 100 million.

B shall specify that the payment was made on May 30, 2014 to A.

“A” entered the contents of “A”, etc., and written “A”: (a) D representative director A, and “B”; and (b) attached the official seal affixed at will on the side of the union members of the above C Hospital in the above column C, and affixed the official seal affixed thereto.

In addition, on May 30, 2014, the Defendant conspiredd with H in the “G” restaurant operated by the Defendant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu.

As a result, the Defendant forged, and exercised, a summary statement in the name of C Hospital staff members, which is a private document on rights and duties.

B. On August 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on the ground of the lower court’s first instance judgment, on August 2014, 201, the Defendant, at his own discretion, agreed to have the right to operate the first floor store above the C hospital, and received the down payment with the title “Agreement” on A4 as the title “Agreement.”

Specifying the purport of “herbly: C Hospital’s union members, and shop occupants: D representative director A, and shop occupants: E: The following contract-based public official seal was affixed at will on the back to the name of the union members of the C Hospital in order to state that “E” was followed.

In addition, on the 11th of the same month, H, who is aware of these circumstances, was attending the above restaurant.

As a result, the defendant forges a letter of agreement in the name of the Trade Union Members of C Hospital, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

arrow