logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.01 2013나9603
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 8,600,000 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto from May 21, 201 to May 1, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with Nonparty A and B (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) with respect to the insurance period from June 8, 2010 to June 8, 2011.

B. The Defendant, as a provider of coastal passenger transportation services under the Marine Transportation Act, is a company that carries on marine passenger transportation with C, which is a passenger ship (hereinafter “instant passenger ship”).

C. Around 09:10 on April 17, 201, the instant passenger ship was anchored at the start line of a meltdong-dong passenger ship terminal located in Gyeyang-gu, Doyang-gun, Doyang-do. Nonparty A was driving the instant vehicle back to the direction of the instant passenger ship from the start line to the instant passenger ship, which was intended to accompany Nonparty D with the instant vehicle and to board the instant passenger ship.

G, as an employee of the Defendant, demanded that the instant vehicle be set off on the instant vehicle by the passenger, who enters the entrance of the landing place.

However, the driver of the instant vehicle A did not comply with G’s lower demand while the driver of the instant vehicle: (a) the son D ought to take a bridge; (b) he did not comply with G’s demand.

As a result, G demanded a re-stopping from A and D, but A made a string that it is called a person who has any inconvenience in the bridge, and rejected a conversation by cutting the window of the instant vehicle and cutting it down until the door.

As a result, G continued 15 meters from the entrance of the landing place to the connecting part of the foreline of the instant vehicle to the foreline, and demanded the foreline.

E. Meanwhile, E, an employee of the Defendant in charge of parking guidance on the instant passenger ship, continued to induce the moving of the instant vehicle under the circumstance that G does not know whether the passenger was on board the instant vehicle, in order to not give any particular signal.

F. Nonparty A, who left the instant passenger ship and was parked in the deck of the instant passenger ship after passing through a slope for loading the stem mp load, etc. of the instant passenger ship, shall be the crew E, deck protection zone, and the instant passenger ship.

arrow