(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.09.13 2017고단756

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.09.13 2017고단756

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of two hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 11, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol leveling of approximately 680 meters from the 680 meters to the Switzerland Corresponding 0.312% from the blood alcohol leveling at approximately 0.312% from the 680-meter section under the influence of alcohol leveling to the Switzerland 0.312% from the 680-meter-based Switzerland, Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, the Switzerland-si culture of 20-do.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving service of BSkick Corsch Rexroth.

On June 11, 2017, the Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, driven the above mar while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.312% in blood, and led to the driving of the above marc in front of the D marc in Changwon-si C, Changwon-si, to a non-school-free plane from the marc parking lot at the front of the day.

Since there was a slope to the left side, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the suspect neglected to do so and went away without taking necessary measures, such as providing personal information, even though the repair cost equivalent to KRW 844,048, such as the replacement of the f bargaining passenger car by the victim E, which was parked on the right side of the front side of the road as it was, due to the shock of the front part of the f bargaining passenger car owned by the victim E, which was parked on the right side of the front side of the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A traffic accident report and an accident-related photograph;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver at home and report on the detection of the driver at home;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 14 of the same Act.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.06.22 2018고단481

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.04.19 2018고단64

-수원지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고단7719

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.05.29 2018고단177

-인천지방법원 2021.01.13 2020고단9209