logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.01.07 2015고단1171
장애인활동지원에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B was punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant C was punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the recipient of activity support for persons with disabilities as the chairperson of the G branch of the G branch of the Association of Persons with Disabilities at Time of Gyeonggi-do, which is an incorporated association, and the defendant D is the disabled activity assistant belonging to the above branch as the denial of the above A, the defendant C is the head of activity support team for persons with disabilities belonging to the above branch, and the defendant B is the recipient

Activity assistant shall not provide recipients with activity support benefits, such as support for activities supporting physical activities, household activities, mobility, etc., by visiting the homes, etc. of persons with disabilities selected as recipients, and shall not provide any act for the family of recipients, the act for supporting the livelihood of recipients or their family members, or any act deemed unnecessary to provide no hindrance to the self-reliance of recipients.

A recipient shall accurately calculate the hours during which an activity support allowances have been provided by paying activity support allowances before and after receiving activity support subsidies from an activity support assistant, and by paying the real-time payment using a settlement terminal, and an activity support assistant shall claim activity support allowances as much as the hours have.

1. Defendant A and D’s joint criminal acts committed with H, in collusion with Defendant A, and D’s assistants belonging to the above branch from November 2, 201 to December 22, 2013, Defendant A issued their voucher cards to Defendant D, and Defendant D had H work as an employee at the music room operated by the above Defendants in the same city and in the same city, and Defendant D had H work as an employee at the music room operated by the above Defendants in the same city, and Defendant A’s cyber university learning supporting materials recorded, even though Defendant A had not provided the activity support allowances to Defendant A by receiving the horse at the end of the last day from H, or by issuing the voucher cards to H and allowing H to settle the payment by means of issuing the voucher cards to H, the sum of KRW 24,94,969,96, Sept. 26, 200, as shown in attached Table 1 of the Crimes Day.

arrow