logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.14 2017나2983
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The quoted trial of the first instance court was examined closely by the parties’ allegations and the evidence presented at the first instance court and the first instance court. However, it does not seem that there was any error in the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The phrase "statement of calculation of the amount of damages" in Section 9 of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by the number of pages 6 of the judgment.

The 5th written judgment of the first instance court shall be subject to the second written judgment of the first instance to the "neinary department".

The 66th 15th 15th 15th 15th 2015 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written “6th 66th 66th 6th 66th 66th 2015”.

From 7th to 5th of the first instance judgment (excluding marks) the same 7th of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

6,35,00 won is required for future treatment costs, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff had received the above treatment by the date of the closing of argument in the trial. Therefore, the above expenses shall be deemed to have been disbursed on June 21, 2017, which is the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial for the convenience of calculation, and the above expenses shall be calculated at the present price at the time of the accident." Part 7, 17, 8, 2, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, and 7,

“F. If so, the Defendant is liable for dispute as to the existence and scope of the obligation of the Defendant from September 28, 2014, the date of the instant accident to September 14, 2017, 15% per annum under the Civil Act until July 14, 2017, and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment, to the date of full payment, with respect to KRW 115,339,467, a solatium of KRW 10,467, a solatium of KRW 115,339,467, a solatium of KRW 10,00,00, and property damage therefrom, and the existence and scope of the obligation of the Defendant from September 28, 2014 to the date of full payment.

arrow