logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.06.12 2014고정188
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 18, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on May 18, 2010, the victim E operating D at the office located in the following City B, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, “The Defendant is 2.1 million won of the debt to be repaid to the C president F; (b) instead, the Defendant would make a monthly payment while performing the work in D at home.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even after borrowing it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and allowing the victim who believed the horses to be true, to make a payment by subrogation to the F, acquired 2.1 million won.

2. On June 22, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the D Office located in the Gunsan-si, Sigsan-si, stating, “I will make a monthly rent deposit to be borrowed only three million won a monthly rent deposit, and will make a monthly payment to the victim in good faith while performing the duty of care.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if it was borrowed.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and forcing the victim who believed the end to be true, acquired 3 million won by deceiving the victim.

3. On July 20, 2010, the Defendant concluded that, at the place referred to in the preceding paragraph, the victim “I will be hospitalized in the Gansan Hospital, for children hospitalized in the Gansan Hospital, and need to be 3,200,000 won out of medical expenses.” The Defendant borrowed medical expenses at monthly salary.

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even after borrowing it.

The Defendant, as such, received KRW 3.2 million from the victim who deceivings the victim to believe that the horses are true.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a loan certificate and a copy of the transactions;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention at a workhouse;

arrow