beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants were working in Kuta, Inc. for the manufacture and sale of rubber products, such as various kinds of rubber products, and Defendant C retired from office on December 31, 2009, and the Plaintiffs and Defendant D on December 31, 2010, respectively. Defendant E voluntarily retired from office on February 20, 2010.
B. The gold-free stock company and the trade union of the above company agreed to implement the interim settlement of retirement benefits before reaching the age of 56 on July 10, 2006. Accordingly, on December 31, 2009, the retirement allowances for the period of service after receiving the interim settlement of retirement benefits on December 20, 2008, were to be paid separately at the time of retirement, and on December 31, 2010, the retirement allowances for the period of service after receiving the interim settlement of retirement benefits on December 31, 2009 were to be paid separately at the time of retirement. The retirement allowances for the period of service until December 31, 2010 after receiving the interim settlement of retirement benefits on December 20, 2009, thereafter the retirement allowances were to be paid separately at the time of retirement.
C. However, on December 31, 2009, gold-free stock company paid 53.61% of the interim retirement allowances and the total retirement allowances that were unpaid at the time of retirement on May 14, 2010, and the remaining retirement allowances on June 18, 2010 to the retired retirees on December 31, 2009, respectively. The corporation paid the interim retirement allowances as of December 20, 201 to the retired retirees on December 20, 201, and paid the retirement allowances as of May 14, 201 and June 18, 2010 to the retired retirees on December 31, 201.
Accordingly, 22 persons, including Defendant C, retired on December 31, 2009, 222 persons including the Plaintiffs and Defendant D, including retirement workers on December 31, 2010, and 37 persons including Defendant E, who retired on February 20, 2010, appointed the Defendants as representatives to perform the lawsuit, and on October 11, 201, appointed Defendant C as the designated party, and sought interest in arrears, etc. of the above retirement pay from the Gwangju District Court Decision 201Ga12592 against Defendant C.